W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ddwg-comments@w3.org > April 2008

[LC-1967] RE: DDR Simple API - Reference to the Core Vocabulary unified in section 3

From: Rotan Hanrahan <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:12:30 -0400
Message-ID: <D5306DC72D165F488F56A9E43F2045D3018B12CB@FTO.mobileaware.com>
To: "JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA" <jmcf@tid.es>
Cc: <public-ddwg-comments@w3.org>
Hello José,

 

Thank you for your comment. We have recorded this as 'LC-1967' and will reply to you as soon as possible.

 

On behalf of DDWG,

Rotan Hanrahan,

Chair.

 

From: public-ddwg-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA
Sent: 15 April 2008 15:30
To: public-ddwg-comments@w3.org
Subject: DDR Simple API - Reference to the Core Vocabulary unified in section 3

 

This is an editorial comment:

 

In Section 1.2 it is said:

 

"The DDR Simple API does not define any Properties and does not mandate the use of any particular Vocabulary of such Properties. 

The DDWG strongly recommends that its Core Vocabulary is supported by all DDRs."

 

Also in Section 3 it is said

 

"The DDWG has published a suggested "Core" Vocabulary for essential Properties for Web content adaptation [Core Vocabulary] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-DDR-Simple-API-20080404/#CORE-VOCAB> . It is anticipated that implementations will extend the Core Vocabulary, which may be used as an example for such extensions. Properties that extend the Core Vocabulary must be in a different namespace to the Core Vocabulary." 

 

----------

 

Proposed Amendment:

 

We suggest to merge Section 1.2 paragraph with Section 3 paragraph, saying 

 

"The DDWG has published a suggested "Core" Vocabulary for essential Properties for Web content adaptation [Core Vocabulary] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-DDR-Simple-API-20080404/#CORE-VOCAB> . Implementations should support this vocabulary. Additionally, It is anticipated that implementations will extend the Core Vocabulary, which may be used as an example for such extensions. Properties that extend the Core Vocabulary must be in a different namespace to the Core Vocabulary." 

 

The above text will be in section 3

Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 18:32:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:41:40 UTC