public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from January 2017 by author

Andy Seaborne

• Re: core remaining issues (Wednesday, 11 January)

Bart van Leeuwen

• Re: WG Meeting 2017-01-04 (Tuesday, 3 January)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] (Friday, 27 January)
• My role in the ShEx CG (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-221 (sh:Shape hierarchy): Simplify the class hierarchy of shapes [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-221 (sh:Shape hierarchy): Simplify the class hierarchy of shapes [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: WG meeting 2017-01-18 (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Proposed next steps (was: Re: core remaining issues) (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: core remaining issues (Friday, 6 January)
• core remaining issues (Friday, 6 January)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: Process Question: How to clean up meeting minutes (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: Process Question: How to clean up meeting minutes (Thursday, 5 January)

Holger Knublauch

• WG Meeting 2017-02-01 (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] (Friday, 27 January)
• SHACL draft ready for review (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-221 (sh:Shape hierarchy): Simplify the class hierarchy of shapes [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 26 January)
• ISSUE-219: sh:xor added (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-221 (sh:Shape hierarchy): Simplify the class hierarchy of shapes [SHACL - Core] (Wednesday, 25 January)
• WG meeting 2017-01-25 (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-218 (Move annotations): Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note? [SHACL - SPARQL] (Thursday, 19 January)
• ISSUE-92: Please review sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint (Thursday, 19 January)
• WG meeting 2017-01-18 (Tuesday, 17 January)
• New version of SHACL specification (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Added auto-generated appendix with list of SHACL syntax rules (Sunday, 15 January)
• Re: ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? (Thursday, 12 January)
• ISSUE-170: EXISTS removed (Thursday, 12 January)
• WG Meeting 2017-01-11 (Tuesday, 10 January)
• ISSUE-216: How to explain syntax rules for ill-formed shapes (Tuesday, 10 January)
• ISSUE-68: New proposal (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: core remaining issues (Saturday, 7 January)
• Re: Process Question: How to clean up meeting minutes (Thursday, 5 January)
• Process Question: How to clean up meeting minutes (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: WG Meeting 2017-01-04 (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Re: WG Meeting 2017-01-04 (Tuesday, 3 January)
• WG Meeting 2017-01-04 (Monday, 2 January)

Irene Polikoff

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? (Thursday, 12 January)
• ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? (Thursday, 12 January)
• update from W3 management (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: core remaining issues (Friday, 6 January)

Pano Maria

• Re: WG Meeting 2017-01-04 (Monday, 2 January)

RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

• shapes-ISSUE-222 (Pre-binding 2): Response to "On pre-binding" [SHACL - SPARQL] (Tuesday, 31 January)
• shapes-ISSUE-221 (sh:Shape hierarchy): Simplify the class hierarchy of shapes [SHACL - Core] (Wednesday, 25 January)
• shapes-ISSUE-220 (what is a shape): defining shapes in a shapes graph [SHACL - Core] (Wednesday, 25 January)
• shapes-ISSUE-219 (One-of shapes): Should we add a one-of-a-list-of-shapes operator [SHACL - Core] (Tuesday, 24 January)
• shapes-ISSUE-218 (Move annotations): Should we move SPARQL Annotations mechanism into the WG Note? [SHACL - SPARQL] (Tuesday, 17 January)

Simon Steyskal

• Re: WG meeting 2017-01-18 (Wednesday, 18 January)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• Re: WG Meeting 2017-01-04 (Tuesday, 3 January)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 January 2017 08:52:25 UTC