Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 23 June 2016

Ok, I added ISSUE-41 to the agenda.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
IBM Cloud


Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote on 06/22/2016 04:10:55 PM:

> From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
> To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
> Date: 06/22/2016 04:12 PM
> Subject: Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 23 June 2016
> 
> I am currently blocked by a resolution to ISSUE-41
> 
> 
https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Proposals#ISSUE-41:_Property_Paths

> 
> about dropping sh:inverseProperty and using sh:predicate or sh:path.
> I would appreciate a short discussion on that so that I can proceed 
> with updating the spec. Asking around in the last meeting, this 
> seemed to be uncontroversial but we need a formal resolution. To 
> clarify what I am talking about, the syntax of path constraints would be
> 
> ex:MyShape
>     a sh:Shape ;
>     sh:property [
>         sh:path [ sh:inversePath ex:parent ] ;
>         ...
>     ] .
> 
> Thanks,
> Holger
> 

> On 23/06/2016 7:43, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> Here is the agenda for this week:
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2016.06.23
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web 
> Technologies - IBM Cloud