Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec

On Aug 13, 2016 06:09, "Holger Knublauch" <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> thanks for looking into this. I see still nothing wrong. The
>
> <section id="sotd"></section>
>
> that produces this text is still there and hasn't been changed for
months. Also, we do have an entry
>
> wgPatentURI:  "http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/73865/status",
>
> which will be used to populate the patent policy. I did some more
(failed) attempts playing with document status (to WD). I also compared our
metadata with one that was recently published without problems, but don't
see any real differences.
>
> I am clueless at this stage and will need to post to some other W3C
mailing list (unless someone here has other ideas). Just to let you know
that we have  a delay with the publication.

Automation is great, except when it isn't.

I am, in principle, on vacation at my grandmother-in-law's cabin for 9 days
but I'll find some opportunity to sneak away, some outlet to power my
laptop (I never go anywhere without it), and some digital network to
transport my bits.

> Holger
>
>
>
> On 12/08/2016 16:29, Simon Steyskal wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>>>  "key": "no-disclosures",
>>>  "type": {
>>>  "name": "sotd.pp"
>>> .............
>>>  To me these look like problems in the header metdata, but I am not
>>> aware of changes from our side. I tried to make sense of this using
>>> https://www.w3.org/pubrules [2] and the little info that I could find
>>> on specberus, but maybe those more experienced with the W3C process
>>> (cough, Eric) may have seen this before?
>>
>>
>> Sounds like it's about the document status section [1]:
>>
>> "§ It MUST include this text related to patent policy requirements (with
suitable links inserted; see guidelines for linking to disclosure pages):
>>
>>     This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February
2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent
disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that
page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who
has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains
Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with section
6 of the W3C Patent Policy."
>>
>> cheers,
>> simon
>>
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/pubrules/doc/rules/?profile=WD#document-status
>>
>> ---
>> DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
>> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna
>>
>> www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys
>>
>> Am 2016-08-12 05:03, schrieb Holger Knublauch:
>>>
>>> I was trying to publish a new version of the SHACL spec using Echidna
>>> but this time got two new errors that I cannot explain:
>>>
>>> "specberus": {
>>>  "status": "failure",
>>>  "errors": [
>>>  {
>>>  "key": "no-disclosures",
>>>  "type": {
>>>  "name": "sotd.pp"
>>>  }
>>>  },
>>>  {
>>>  "key": "no-homepage",
>>>  "extra": {
>>>  "homepage": "http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/ [1]"
>>>  },
>>>  "type": {
>>>  "name": "sotd.group-homepage",
>>>  "section": "document-status",
>>>  "rule": "WGLink"
>>>  }
>>>  }
>>>  ]
>>>  },
>>>  To me these look like problems in the header metdata, but I am not
>>> aware of changes from our side. I tried to make sense of this using
>>> https://www.w3.org/pubrules [2] and the little info that I could find
>>> on specberus, but maybe those more experienced with the W3C process
>>> (cough, Eric) may have seen this before?
>>>
>>>  (Besides, what would be the URL to give to the pubrules test server?
>>> I tried
>>>
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/data-shapes/gh-pages/shacl/index.html
>>> [3] but that produces 28 errors).
>>>
>>>  Thanks!
>>>  Holger
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Links:
>>> ------
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/
>>> [2] https://www.w3.org/pubrules
>>> [3]
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/data-shapes/gh-pages/shacl/index.html
>
>
>