- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 12:24:08 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 1/22/2015 11:16, Karen Coyle wrote: > The question, though, is how one > would express this without using SPIN I assume you mean "without using SPARQL"? > - in other words, do we have a > generic way to express this requirement? I think it gets back to how one > defines to target of the validation. Because these two cases have two > different solutions, should they be different requirements? Any complex constraint expressed using SPARQL can be turned into a (SPIN/LDOM) template. This means that some experts can prepare high-level lego bricks for people who don't know SPARQL. The items mentioned under "Property declarations" are basically the most common patterns, and those should of course be built-in. We may identify other recurring patterns that should also be covered by built-ins (such as templates). Holger
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2015 02:27:36 UTC