Re: shapes-ISSUE-8 (S6 Clarification ): S6 doesn't clearly state what feature is required from Holger Knublauch on 2015-02-15 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from February 2015)

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:48:03 +1000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <54E13033.80104@topquadrant.com>

I have contacted Ralph about

https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S6:_Partial_ontology_import

and made edits to clarify that this story does not contain constraints 
and is therefore out of scope as a User Story that produces 
Requirements. It is rather a possible solution outline for the problem 
of "different shapes at different times" - a solution that already works 
and neither requires changes to the languages nor new features.

I hope my edits have addressed this ISSUE.

Holger

On 12/19/2014 13:06, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> shapes-ISSUE-8 (S6 Clarification ): S6 doesn't clearly state what feature is required
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/8
>
> Raised by: Peter Patel-Schneider
> On product:
>
> Story S6 https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S6:_Closed-world_recognition_for_e.g._for_partial_ontology_import is about partial ontology import.  Is this something that needs to be done for constraints, or is it something that needs to be done in RDF?
>
>
>

Received on Sunday, 15 February 2015 23:49:35 UTC