- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:01:48 -0800
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 2/14/15 9:37 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> The question is only sensible if one already assumes RDFS or OWL >> >semantics. Outside of RDFS/OWL semantics, resources can do all these >> >things without being classes. > OK, so replace RDF classes with "RDF types in RDF and RDFS classes in > RDFS". The point is whether documents will contain triples that use shapes > where there are now RDF type or RDFS classes. > If instance data will use shapes where they now use RDF, how would you fulfill the requirements implied in User Story #4 [1] where the same node in a graph can serve multiple roles? Or in general how do you address re-usability of your data in different contexts? kc [1] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S4:_Issue_repository -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Saturday, 14 February 2015 18:02:23 UTC