Re: agenda for F2F1

* Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> [2014-10-21 08:42-0700]
> Hi Peter,
> I agree we need to settle the agenda for the face to face meeting.
> 
> I discussed with Eric the idea of having people present. I imagine two 
> types of contents could be useful: 1. use cases and requirements, 2. 
> proposed direction on how to address them. The risk is to have too much 
> repetition or just be a rehash of the workshop.
> 
> Eric is interested in giving a general presentation to get us started.

My goal is to give around a 45 minute overview of the requirements and
how OWL, SPIN, ShEx, and tricks like Google's "property paths" meet
these reqs. Folks may want to go into greater depth on the technologies
on Fri.


> I would like to know who would be interested in presenting something. How 
> long you'd like (should probably keep it to 15mn max) and what you'd 
> cover.
> 
> If people could reply to this email with that info that would be helpful. 
> We can then discuss it on tomorrow's call.
> 
> Thanks!
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Standards - IBM 
> Software Group
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:   "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
> To:     public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
> Date:   10/21/2014 06:54 AM
> Subject:        agenda for F2F1
> 
> 
> 
> Is the agenda for F2F1 going to be fixed soon?
> 
> peter
> 
> PS:  I'm willing to talk about using OWL syntax for RDF constraints.
> 
> 

-- 
-ericP

office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.

Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2014 21:17:29 UTC