Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations

Hi Arthur,

I am looking forward to seeing this worked out as a specific example. 
Currently I don't see why named graphs would not cover your use cases.

This topic is crucial to discuss exhaustively because it sits at the 
very foundation of the differences between ShEx/Resource Shapes and 
OWL/SPIN.

Holger


On 11/6/2014 7:47, Arthur Ryman wrote:
> There are a few motivations for decoupling shapes and classes. One is that
> the creation shape may be different than the update shape. Another has to
> do with custom properties. I'll write up the following in the wiki.
>
> OSLC supports an open content model for resources. It is common for tools
> to add their own custom properties, and for projects within a tool to have
> different user-defined properties. For example, consider a bug tracking
> tool. Project A may add a custom property foo and project B may add bar.
> All projects use the same RDF type for bug resources, e.g.
> oslc_cm:ChangeRequest. However, the shape for resources in project A
> differs for the shape for project B.
> _________________________________________________________
> Arthur Ryman
> Chief Data Officer
> SWG | Rational
> 905.413.3077 (phone) | 416.939.5063 (cell)
> IBM InterConnect 2015
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2014 23:45:23 UTC