- From: Simon Steyskal <ssteyska@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:54:24 +0100
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Am 2014-12-04 11:41, schrieb Eric Prud'hommeaux: > I would say that before minutes are approved, any good-faith edits are > encouraged and appreciated. After they are approved, the person > editing should probably ask themselves if a change they are making is > substantial (e.g. adding a resolution that didn't make it into the > minutes) and if so, send mail to the WG documenting the change. Alright! I've just uploaded the edited version. simon --- Dipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys Am 2014-12-04 11:41, schrieb Eric Prud'hommeaux: > * Simon Steyskal <ssteyska@wu.ac.at> [2014-12-04 11:35+0100] >> Hi! >> >> Since I'm not entirely sure if others than the responsible scribe >> are allowed to alter the minutes, I just wanted to mention that I >> have replaced the UNKNOWN_AUTHORs with the correct ones but did not >> upload these changes yet. >> >> So maybe we want to clarify (or refresh if already specified and I'm >> just missing the information) best practices regarding editing >> minutes @ todays call. > > I would say that before minutes are approved, any good-faith edits are > encouraged and appreciated. After they are approved, the person > editing should probably ask themselves if a change they are making is > substantial (e.g. adding a resolution that didn't make it into the > minutes) and if so, send mail to the WG documenting the change. > > >> cheers, >> simon >> >> --- >> Dipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal >> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna >> >> www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys >> >> >> >> Am 2014-12-04 04:57, schrieb Arnaud Le Hors: >> >"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote on >> >12/03/2014 05:53:55 PM: >> > >> > > From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com> >> >>To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org >> > >> >>Date: 12/03/2014 05:54 PM >> >>Subject: Re: Data Shapes WG Minutes for 20 November 2014 >> >> >> > > The links at the beginning of the document don't seem to work. >> > >> >Fixed. Thanks. >> > >> > > >> > > Is there any way to get a list of resolutions out of the minutes? >> > > Resolutions >> > > are one of the most important parts of our meetings. >> > >> >I agree and actually looked into it. Here is what I found in >> >scribe.perl: >> > >> >###################################################################### >> > >> ># FEATURE WISH LIST / BUG LIST: >> ># >> >... >> ># 0.1 Summarize RESOLUTIONS at the beginning or end. (Also move >> >summary >> ># of action items to the beginning?) >> ># >> > >> >From what I can tell Bert Bos from W3C is trying to rewrite this >> >script. Hopefully this will give us something better. Unfortunately >> >this ought to be a side project he has taken on on himself and it may >> >be a while before he completes anything. >> >In the meantime the only way to check for resolutions is to search for >> >the word "resolution"... >> > >> >> >> > > peter >> > > >> > > >> > > On 12/03/2014 01:43 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: >> > > > Hi, >> > > > I thought I sent out already but apparently not. The minutes of >> > > our last call >> > > > are available for review: >> > > > http://www.w3.org/2014/11/20-shapes-minutes.html [1] >> > > > -- >> > > > Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web >> >Standards - IBM >> > > > Software Group >> > > >> > >> > -- >> > Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Standards - >> >IBM Software Group >> > >> > >> >Links: >> >------ >> >[1] http://www.w3.org/2014/11/20-shapes-minutes.html >>
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2014 10:54:51 UTC