Re: Implementors please step forward!

On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 16:13:35 +0100, Jeni Tennison
<jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We discussed progress on the call today and we really need everyone's
> help on implementation for two reasons:
> 
> 1. the test cases that have entirely been produced by Gregg and they
>    need to be validated against other implementations
> 
> 2. we are getting near Candidate Recommendation publication, but will
>    need to have some confidence about implementations to be able to
>    predict how long the CR phase will need to be (and to make the
>     argument that it’s worth progressing at all)
> 
> If you are creating an implementation, please could you give us an
> update on your progress and your timeframes?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jeni

Is there some recipe of what is required by implementors?

I am subscribed, but it was too loud/noisy to follow and time was short

With CSV implementations running for both perl5 and perl6, I'd be
interested into looking at extending the functionality for both

RFC7111 was easy, but is CSVW too?

I have no timeframe or plan so far at all

-- 
H.Merijn Brand  http://tux.nl   Perl Monger  http://amsterdam.pm.org/
using perl5.00307 .. 5.21   porting perl5 on HP-UX, AIX, and openSUSE
http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/        http://www.test-smoke.org/
http://qa.perl.org   http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/