- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 14:36:51 +0100
- To: "public-csv-wg@w3.org" <public-csv-wg@w3.org>, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Last week Ivan, Gregg and I had an informal call. Super brief IRC log here, http://www.w3.org/2015/04/01-csvw-irc We talked somewhat more than scribed, but the main point of record was made by Ivan: "we have to be a little more administrative (final reviews etc) in coming period. coming back next week, we might be ready to have a publication on the following tuesday. … aiming at 16th April currently. unless Jeremy or Jeni hits a major issue, it should be doable." Jeni/Jeremy, how are things looking editorially from your side? Those of us who are around - let's have a call tomorrow. Checking in on Github, I see 5 items from Jeni listed as requiring teleconf attention (and none from anyone else): https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Requires+telcon+discussion%2Fdecision%22 https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/444 "Should tables have a schema annotation?" https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/445 "Row annotations in conversion specifications" https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/446 "Inherited property annotations on columns" https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/448 "Is specifying default metadata necessary?" https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/449 "HTTP headers vs dialects" All of these have had some discussion in Github. Assuming we manage to reach a resolution on each before or during tomorrow's call, does publishing on April 16th still sound feasible? Other editors - can you confirm that you have no further issues requiring teleconf discussion? Dan (around tomorrow, happy to chair)
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 13:37:24 UTC