W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-csv-wg@w3.org > April 2015

Editor/spec status check and April 8th call?

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 14:36:51 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=45mbRj=uY8jg3LtUfV1FiQiCSevLikmccx2iMt-K-NkA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-csv-wg@w3.org" <public-csv-wg@w3.org>, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Last week Ivan, Gregg and I had an informal call.

Super brief IRC log here, http://www.w3.org/2015/04/01-csvw-irc

We talked somewhat more than scribed, but the main point of record was
made by Ivan:

"we have to be a little more administrative (final reviews etc) in
coming period.
 coming back next week, we might be ready to have a publication on the
following tuesday.
… aiming at 16th April currently. unless Jeremy or Jeni hits a major
issue, it should be doable."

Jeni/Jeremy, how are things looking editorially from your side?

Those of us who are around - let's have a call tomorrow.

Checking in on Github, I see 5 items from Jeni listed as requiring
teleconf attention (and none from anyone else):


https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/444 "Should tables have a schema annotation?"
https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/445 "Row annotations in conversion
https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/446 "Inherited property annotations
on columns"
https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/448 "Is specifying default metadata
https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/449 "HTTP headers vs dialects"

All of these have had some discussion in Github. Assuming we manage to
reach a resolution on each before or during tomorrow's call, does
publishing on April 16th still sound feasible? Other editors - can you
confirm that you have no further issues requiring teleconf discussion?


(around tomorrow, happy to chair)
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 13:37:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 7 April 2015 13:37:24 UTC