Re: moving the use case document to FPWD

Tandy, all,

I will try to have a look at the files Monday or Tuesday to see if the document is o.k. in terms of our 'pubrules'. That may reveal issues.

One question is how you guys prefer to do that in terms of github management. A move like that would require make some changes in the respec preamble; some of those (and also some possible changes in the document) are there to stay, whereas others are specific to that publication (date, status, that sort of things). I am not very good in github usage, to be honest, but is the following approach plausible?

1 We create a separate branch in github for the March publishing
2 I do all the changes in that branch; 
3 once the publication is over, the branch is merged into the main branch, with the only changes setting the document status and date back to an editors' copy

The only issue is that the same repo also includes Jeni's document, which is not yet changed. I presume I can merge the main branch into the publishing branch, right?

ivan



On 16 Mar 2014, at 16:50 , Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> wrote:

> Great. I have now:
>  
> -          Added an additional use case in response to the “Direct Mapping” requirement from David Booth
> -          Renumbered the use cases
> -          Clustered the requirements
>  
> As far as I am concerned, we have ticked off everything we said we would do ahead of the cutoff on Monday.
>  
> It turns out that I have to travel @ 9am on Monday (to get flights etc.) so I will not now be able to edit the document tomorrow.
>  
> Also, as I will be chairing a meeting in the US all of next week:
> -          I won’t be able to dial into the teleconference on Wednesday
> -          I won’t be able to edit the document or update the git repository … so should changes need to be made (e.g. editorial, typo fixing etc.), I hope that Eric and Davide can do them
>  
> I think the Use Case document is fit for publication as FPWD. I don’t anticipate the need for material changes ahead of FPWD publication.
>  
> BR, Jeremy
>  
> From: Ceolin, D. [mailto:d.ceolin@vu.nl] 
> Sent: 15 March 2014 14:27
> To: Eric Stephan; Tandy, Jeremy
> Cc: W3C CSV on the Web Working Group
> Subject: Re: moving the use case document to FPWD
>  
> Jeremy, Eric, all,
>  
> I have added use case #21, "Displaying Locations of Care Homes on a Map",  http://w3c.github.io/csvw/use-cases-and-requirements/#UC-DisplayingLocationsOfCareHomesOnAMap
> If I understood it correctly, it requires CSV to JSON transformation, so I have added it as a requirement. 
> I've also checked and fixed a couple of typos in the other use cases mentioned yesterday, that now *should* be ok.
> Cheers,
>  
> Davide
>  
> Il giorno 14/mar/2014, alle ore 22.57, Davide Ceolin ha scritto:
> 
> 
> Jeremy and Eric,
>  
> I think I have incorporated all the comments in UC#20 (Representing Entities Extracted from Text) and UC#22 (Intelligently Previewing CSV Files), and that should complete the amendments (comments welcome!).
> Tomorrow morning I'll give a last check and add UC#21 (Displaying locations of care homes on a map).
> Cheers,
>  
> Davide
>  
>  
> Il giorno 14/mar/2014, alle ore 20.10, Eric Stephan ha scritto:
> 
> 
> Jeremy and Davide,
> 
> I completed and checked in the Palo Alto data use case I *think* that
> completes everything that I promised.    I'll be on-line over the
> weekend if anything comes up.  I might attempt adding the table we
> discussed yesterday.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Eric
> 
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Jeremy and Davide,
>  
> My responses are below using a >> and capital letters.  By use of the
> capital letters I'm not shouting just helping making answers more
> visible.  :-)
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Eric
>  
>  
> 1)      [Eric] add use case #16 City of Palo Alto tree data
>  
> YES
>  
> 2)      [Eric] add use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map
>  
> POSSIBLY ADDED TO DAVIDE'S LIST?
>  
>  
> 4)      [Eric] tease out and make explicit the requirements in use
> cases #7, #12 and #17 ... noting the implied "microsyntax" requirement
> in #7
>  
> YES
>  
>  
> Also, Eric: we previously talked about adding a use case about ncdump
> (netcdf dump). Is this still necessary / feasible?
>  
> YES
>  
> Davide: it seems Eric has a lot still to do ... are you able to take
> action #2 (adding use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a
> map). Please refer to my earlier email for my thoughts on that use
> case (not much to say - but could be helpful).
>  
>  
>  
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Tandy, Jeremy
> <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> wrote:
> Hi - in today's teleconf we agreed a number of things to complete for
> Monday.
>  
>  
>  
> 1)      [Eric] add use case #16 City of Palo Alto tree data
>  
> 2)      [Eric] add use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map
>  
> 3)      [Davide] complete amendments to use cases about "intelligent
> preview" and "representing entities and facts" - see emails here and here.
>  
> 4)      [Eric] tease out and make explicit the requirements in use cases #7,
> #12 and #17 ... noting the implied "microsyntax" requirement in #7
>  
> 5)      [Jeremy] renumber use cases into sequential order
>  
> 6)      [Jeremy] cluster requirements as proposed by JeniT
>  
>  
>  
> We agreed that there were not, at this time, latent requirements from CSV-LD
> or CSV2RDF discussion threads.
>  
>  
>  
> Also, Eric: we previously talked about adding a use case about ncdump
> (netcdf dump). Is this still necessary / feasible?
>  
>  
>  
> Davide: it seems Eric has a lot still to do ... are you able to take action #2
> (adding use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map). Please
> refer to my earlier email for my thoughts on that use case (not much to say
> - but could be helpful).
>  
>  
>  
> I'll do actions #5 and #6 on Monday morning based on the structure of the
> document I see at that point in time - so expect the use case numbers to
> have changed by Monday lunch time!
>  
>  
>  
> Please let me know if I've got any of this wrong J
>  
>  
>  
> BR, Jeremy
>  
>  
> ---
> Davide Ceolin MSc.
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> The Network Institute
> VU University Amsterdam
> d.ceolin@vu.nl
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~dceolin/


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
GPG: 0x343F1A3D
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf