Re: moving the use case document to FPWD

Jeremy, Davide, and all,

I plan attending our working group telecon this week. Having I will be very busy thru Wednesday afternoon in preparation for a review from project sponsors.

I should be available after Wednesday for editor activities.

Thanks,

Eric

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 16, 2014, at 8:50 AM, "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> wrote:
> 
> Great. I have now:
>  
> -          Added an additional use case in response to the “Direct Mapping” requirement from David Booth
> -          Renumbered the use cases
> -          Clustered the requirements
>  
> As far as I am concerned, we have ticked off everything we said we would do ahead of the cutoff on Monday.
>  
> It turns out that I have to travel @ 9am on Monday (to get flights etc.) so I will not now be able to edit the document tomorrow.
>  
> Also, as I will be chairing a meeting in the US all of next week:
> -          I won’t be able to dial into the teleconference on Wednesday
> -          I won’t be able to edit the document or update the git repository … so should changes need to be made (e.g. editorial, typo fixing etc.), I hope that Eric and Davide can do them
>  
> I think the Use Case document is fit for publication as FPWD. I don’t anticipate the need for material changes ahead of FPWD publication.
>  
> BR, Jeremy
>  
> From: Ceolin, D. [mailto:d.ceolin@vu.nl] 
> Sent: 15 March 2014 14:27
> To: Eric Stephan; Tandy, Jeremy
> Cc: W3C CSV on the Web Working Group
> Subject: Re: moving the use case document to FPWD
>  
> Jeremy, Eric, all,
>  
> I have added use case #21, "Displaying Locations of Care Homes on a Map",  http://w3c.github.io/csvw/use-cases-and-requirements/#UC-DisplayingLocationsOfCareHomesOnAMap
> If I understood it correctly, it requires CSV to JSON transformation, so I have added it as a requirement. 
> I've also checked and fixed a couple of typos in the other use cases mentioned yesterday, that now *should* be ok.
> Cheers,
>  
> Davide
>  
> Il giorno 14/mar/2014, alle ore 22.57, Davide Ceolin ha scritto:
> 
> 
> Jeremy and Eric,
>  
> I think I have incorporated all the comments in UC#20 (Representing Entities Extracted from Text) and UC#22 (Intelligently Previewing CSV Files), and that should complete the amendments (comments welcome!).
> Tomorrow morning I'll give a last check and add UC#21 (Displaying locations of care homes on a map).
> Cheers,
>  
> Davide
>  
>  
> Il giorno 14/mar/2014, alle ore 20.10, Eric Stephan ha scritto:
> 
> 
> Jeremy and Davide,
> 
> I completed and checked in the Palo Alto data use case I *think* that
> completes everything that I promised.    I'll be on-line over the
> weekend if anything comes up.  I might attempt adding the table we
> discussed yesterday.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Eric
> 
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Jeremy and Davide,
>  
> My responses are below using a >> and capital letters.  By use of the
> capital letters I'm not shouting just helping making answers more
> visible.  :-)
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Eric
>  
>  
> 1)      [Eric] add use case #16 City of Palo Alto tree data
>  
> YES
>  
> 2)      [Eric] add use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map
>  
> POSSIBLY ADDED TO DAVIDE'S LIST?
>  
>  
> 4)      [Eric] tease out and make explicit the requirements in use
> cases #7, #12 and #17 ... noting the implied "microsyntax" requirement
> in #7
>  
> YES
>  
>  
> Also, Eric: we previously talked about adding a use case about ncdump
> (netcdf dump). Is this still necessary / feasible?
>  
> YES
>  
> Davide: it seems Eric has a lot still to do ... are you able to take
> action #2 (adding use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a
> map). Please refer to my earlier email for my thoughts on that use
> case (not much to say - but could be helpful).
>  
>  
>  
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Tandy, Jeremy
> <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> wrote:
> Hi - in today's teleconf we agreed a number of things to complete for
> Monday.
>  
>  
>  
> 1)      [Eric] add use case #16 City of Palo Alto tree data
>  
> 2)      [Eric] add use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map
>  
> 3)      [Davide] complete amendments to use cases about "intelligent
> preview" and "representing entities and facts" - see emails here and here.
>  
> 4)      [Eric] tease out and make explicit the requirements in use cases #7,
> #12 and #17 ... noting the implied "microsyntax" requirement in #7
>  
> 5)      [Jeremy] renumber use cases into sequential order
>  
> 6)      [Jeremy] cluster requirements as proposed by JeniT
>  
>  
>  
> We agreed that there were not, at this time, latent requirements from CSV-LD
> or CSV2RDF discussion threads.
>  
>  
>  
> Also, Eric: we previously talked about adding a use case about ncdump
> (netcdf dump). Is this still necessary / feasible?
>  
>  
>  
> Davide: it seems Eric has a lot still to do ... are you able to take action #2
> (adding use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map). Please
> refer to my earlier email for my thoughts on that use case (not much to say
> - but could be helpful).
>  
>  
>  
> I'll do actions #5 and #6 on Monday morning based on the structure of the
> document I see at that point in time - so expect the use case numbers to
> have changed by Monday lunch time!
>  
>  
>  
> Please let me know if I've got any of this wrong J
>  
>  
>  
> BR, Jeremy
>  
>  
> ---
> Davide Ceolin MSc.
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> The Network Institute
> VU University Amsterdam
> d.ceolin@vu.nl
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~dceolin/
>  
>