- From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 04:11:12 -0700
- To: "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
- Cc: W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
Jeremy, Ncdump - which is now known as "NetCDF-CDL" is now completed and checked in. The only thing I have outstanding I think is the tree population data use case. Thanks, Eric >> Also, Eric: we previously talked about adding a use case about ncdump (netcdf dump). Is this still necessary / feasible? On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote: > Jeremy....I think I've completed and checked in. I'm going on to > the other assignments... > > :4) [Eric] tease out and make explicit the requirements in use > cases #7, #12 and #17 ... noting the implied "microsyntax" requirement > in #7. > > Thanks, > > Eric > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Tandy, Jeremy > <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> wrote: >> Hi - in today's teleconf we agreed a number of things to complete for >> Monday. >> >> >> >> 1) [Eric] add use case #16 City of Palo Alto tree data >> >> 2) [Eric] add use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map >> >> 3) [Davide] complete amendments to use cases about "intelligent >> preview" and "representing entities and facts" - see emails here and here. >> >> 4) [Eric] tease out and make explicit the requirements in use cases #7, >> #12 and #17 ... noting the implied "microsyntax" requirement in #7 >> >> 5) [Jeremy] renumber use cases into sequential order >> >> 6) [Jeremy] cluster requirements as proposed by JeniT >> >> >> >> We agreed that there were not, at this time, latent requirements from CSV-LD >> or CSV2RDF discussion threads. >> >> >> >> Also, Eric: we previously talked about adding a use case about ncdump >> (netcdf dump). Is this still necessary / feasible? >> >> >> >> Davide: it seems Eric has a lot still to do ... are you able to take action #2 >> (adding use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map). Please >> refer to my earlier email for my thoughts on that use case (not much to say >> - but could be helpful). >> >> >> >> I'll do actions #5 and #6 on Monday morning based on the structure of the >> document I see at that point in time - so expect the use case numbers to >> have changed by Monday lunch time! >> >> >> >> Please let me know if I've got any of this wrong J >> >> >> >> BR, Jeremy
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 11:11:48 UTC