- From: Davide Ceolin <davide.ceolin@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 22:57:02 +0100
- To: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>, W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <D03E521A-087E-4B81-93F4-718A91EF4E81@gmail.com>
Jeremy and Eric, I think I have incorporated all the comments in UC#20 (Representing Entities Extracted from Text) and UC#22 (Intelligently Previewing CSV Files), and that should complete the amendments (comments welcome!). Tomorrow morning I'll give a last check and add UC#21 (Displaying locations of care homes on a map). Cheers, Davide Il giorno 14/mar/2014, alle ore 20.10, Eric Stephan ha scritto: > Jeremy and Davide, > > I completed and checked in the Palo Alto data use case I *think* that > completes everything that I promised. I'll be on-line over the > weekend if anything comes up. I might attempt adding the table we > discussed yesterday. > > Cheers, > > Eric > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote: >> Jeremy and Davide, >> >> My responses are below using a >> and capital letters. By use of the >> capital letters I'm not shouting just helping making answers more >> visible. :-) >> >> Thanks, >> >> Eric >> >> >> 1) [Eric] add use case #16 City of Palo Alto tree data >> >>>> YES >> >> 2) [Eric] add use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map >> >>>> POSSIBLY ADDED TO DAVIDE'S LIST? >> >> >> 4) [Eric] tease out and make explicit the requirements in use >> cases #7, #12 and #17 ... noting the implied "microsyntax" requirement >> in #7 >> >>>> YES >> >> >> Also, Eric: we previously talked about adding a use case about ncdump >> (netcdf dump). Is this still necessary / feasible? >> >>>> YES >> >> Davide: it seems Eric has a lot still to do ... are you able to take >> action #2 (adding use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a >> map). Please refer to my earlier email for my thoughts on that use >> case (not much to say - but could be helpful). >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Tandy, Jeremy >> <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> wrote: >>> Hi - in today's teleconf we agreed a number of things to complete for >>> Monday. >>> >>> >>> >>> 1) [Eric] add use case #16 City of Palo Alto tree data >>> >>> 2) [Eric] add use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map >>> >>> 3) [Davide] complete amendments to use cases about "intelligent >>> preview" and "representing entities and facts" - see emails here and here. >>> >>> 4) [Eric] tease out and make explicit the requirements in use cases #7, >>> #12 and #17 ... noting the implied "microsyntax" requirement in #7 >>> >>> 5) [Jeremy] renumber use cases into sequential order >>> >>> 6) [Jeremy] cluster requirements as proposed by JeniT >>> >>> >>> >>> We agreed that there were not, at this time, latent requirements from CSV-LD >>> or CSV2RDF discussion threads. >>> >>> >>> >>> Also, Eric: we previously talked about adding a use case about ncdump >>> (netcdf dump). Is this still necessary / feasible? >>> >>> >>> >>> Davide: it seems Eric has a lot still to do ... are you able to take action #2 >>> (adding use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map). Please >>> refer to my earlier email for my thoughts on that use case (not much to say >>> - but could be helpful). >>> >>> >>> >>> I'll do actions #5 and #6 on Monday morning based on the structure of the >>> document I see at that point in time - so expect the use case numbers to >>> have changed by Monday lunch time! >>> >>> >>> >>> Please let me know if I've got any of this wrong J >>> >>> >>> >>> BR, Jeremy > --- Davide Ceolin MSc. Postdoctoral Researcher The Network Institute VU University Amsterdam d.ceolin@vu.nl http://www.few.vu.nl/~dceolin/
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 21:57:35 UTC