W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-csv-wg@w3.org > June 2014

Re: June 18 call summary: resolved to publish use-cases-and-requirements

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:53:19 +0200
Cc: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>, Davide Ceolin <d.ceolin@vu.nl>, W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Message-Id: <5BF8B0ED-FB9F-488C-AD7E-8278784A93D7@w3.org>
To: "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>

On 19 Jun 2014, at 17:02 , Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> wrote:

> Hi Ivan -
> 
> I've created the new ucr WD on a new branch: pwd-ucr ... because I didn't want to confuse things by publishing early wrt the W3C publishing regime.
> 
> I've got up to step 4.vii of the [publishing process][1] but because I am not on gh-pages branch I can't push my new Overview.html to a publically accessible web server in order to run the W3C pub rules checker.
> 
> Would you just recommend that I merge in the changes with gh-pages branch and get on with the process?

I think there are some magic URI-s that make the source files HTML visible, but I do not know from the top of my head. However... anything that the pubrules ask for are such that they should be in the core source anyway. And as the Overview file appears in a separate folder, and using something like

http://w3c.github.io/csvw/syntax/index.html?specStatus=WD;publishDate=2014-12-12

means that the _only_ change that are necessary are not in the original source: I think it is perfectly o.k. to put everything into the gh-pages branch...

Cheers

Ivan

> 
> Many thanks, Jeremy
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/w3c/csvw/blob/gh-pages/publishing_process.md
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
>> Sent: 19 June 2014 11:37
>> To: Tandy, Jeremy; Jeni Tennison
>> Cc: Eric Stephan; Davide Ceolin; W3C CSV on the Web Working Group; Dan
>> Brickley
>> Subject: Re: June 18 call summary: resolved to publish use-cases-and-
>> requirements
>> 
>> 
>> On 19 Jun 2014, at 10:23 , Tandy, Jeremy
>> <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> wrote:
>> 
>>> Ivan: """Tuesday 1st of July is our best option"""
>>> 
>>> I'm happy with this for next PWD release.
>> 
>> Would this be also a date for publishing the two other (model,
>> metadata) documents, or do we want to do an independent publishing?
>> (Both are fine with me, but we should decide).
>> 
>> Jeremy, can you try to go through the publishing process, as described
>> in the archive? I hope that would work...
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>>> 
>>> Jeremy
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
>>>> Sent: 18 June 2014 17:13
>>>> To: Eric Stephan; Davide Ceolin; Tandy, Jeremy
>>>> Cc: W3C CSV on the Web Working Group; Dan Brickley
>>>> Subject: Re: June 18 call summary: resolved to publish use-cases-
>> and-
>>>> requirements
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 18 Jun 2014, at 15:33 , Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> <skip/>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Next steps: UCR editors, can you wrap up any outstanding tweaks,
>> and
>>>>> liaise with Ivan to get a publication date scheduled? (please copy
>>>> the
>>>>> list on these details)
>>>> 
>>>> Publishing happens on tuesdays and thursdays. It always require some
>>>> preparation and also an agreement with the webmaster (to put this
>>>> into his schedule). Note also what I wrote down after the previous
>> round:
>>>> 
>>>> https://github.com/w3c/csvw/blob/gh-pages/publishing_process.md
>>>> 
>>>> which helps in speeding things up.
>>>> 
>>>> As far as my schedule is concerned, I am free next week Tuesday
>>>> (24th), but I am not really available for the rest of this week (I
>> am
>>>> currently in Oslo for a conference, traveling back on Friday), so
>>>> this may be tight. I am not available on the 26th. I am available on
>>>> the first two weeks of July both on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
>>>> 
>>>> My feeling is that the Tuesday 1st of July is our best option, at
>>>> least from my side (ie, if you can finalize the documents by then)
>>>> 
>>>> Would that work?
>>>> 
>>>> Would we also want to schedule the two other documents for that date
>>>> (model and metadata)? Note that we need an explicit WG resolution
>> and
>>>> a request for an official 'short name' for the latter, because that
>>>> is a first public draft. (In case you wonder: all this admin around
>>>> the first draft is mainly necessary for the management of Patent
>> Policies.
>>>> The world would be simpler if we did not have to deal with that...)
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers
>>>> 
>>>> Ivan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> chairs,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dan
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ----
>>>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>>>> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
>>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>>>> mobile: +31-641044153
>>>> GPG: 0x343F1A3D
>>>> WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> GPG: 0x343F1A3D
>> WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
GPG: 0x343F1A3D
WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me






Received on Thursday, 19 June 2014 17:53:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:40 UTC