- From: Eric A. Meyer <eric@meyerweb.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:29:19 -0500
- To: public-cssselfrags@w3.org
At 16:54 +0100 3/8/12, Robin Berjon wrote:
>Two things. First, I see a use case, at the very least for :invalid.
>"Your application has been reviewed and was found to be in error,
>please make sure that you correct these fields:
>http://kafka.org/bureau/form2035.html#css(:invalid)".
Again, CSS4. Still, the general point is sufficient for me to
agree that we should expand support to cover form-element-state
pseudo-classes.
>Second, and more importantly, for most implementations (which is to
>say, those starting from an existing implementation) I would assume
>that the more things that are not like baseline CSS the more work it
>is. I reckon that removing only the obviously degenerate cases would
>make for a simpler spec overall.
Probably true.
--
Eric A. Meyer (eric@meyerweb.com) http://meyerweb.com/
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 19:29:44 UTC