Re: class=reftest-wait

On 8/3/13 3:39 AM, Tobie Langel wrote:
> If this is to allow scripting of the test, shouldn't we standardize on a JS callback instead of having to poll for a classname change?

It's to allow scripting of the test, and adding a mutation observer is 
not polling...

But yes, injecting script would work too, albeit with a bit more complexity.

-Boris

Received on Saturday, 3 August 2013 14:05:13 UTC