W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [css3-transitions] [css3-animations] API for testing transitions and animations

From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:42:04 +0100
To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.waed0ef4bunlto@oyvinds-desktop>
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:00:06 +0100, fantasai  
<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:

>    http://test.csswg.org/resources/

Oh, good.

>>> I've stripped out our vendor-specific prefixed notation in favor of  
>>> the one
>>> in the spec, I'm sure it won't be to difficult for other interested  
>>> parties
>>> to add their own prefixes with a few sed commands or what have you.
>>
>> For now I've added the prefixes by script in my tests, so that we can
>> look at the results easily.  It's harder to judge the test validity
>> without being able to run it easily in browsers.
>
> This one will take a bit more time to fix... Ideally we'd handle the  
> prefixing in the build scripts,

Not for officially-released versions of the testsuites, I hope. I'd hate  
to see prefixes gain any more legitimacy due to someone noticing that even  
W3C's standards testsuites use them...

> maybe by running a set of regexps stored in a configuration
> file. (Regular expressions should work fine for most static tests, but  
> I'm not
> sure how you'd handle scripting. Would that work for your tests?)

(I'm not sure who you were addressing here, but it would probably work for  
mine.)

-- 
Øyvind Stenhaug
Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 16:42:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 28 February 2012 16:42:45 GMT