W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Spec links in reference files

From: Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:47:56 -0700
To: "css21testsuite@gtalbot.org" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>
Message-ID: <CBBDDABA.1092D%rhauck@adobe.com>
Yep. That's exactly what I encountered.

Either way, it's a bug in Shepherd. Peter, do you need this logged
somewhere?

Thanks!
-Rebecca

On 4/25/12 4:36 PM, "Gérard Talbot" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org> wrote:

>
>Le Mer 25 avril 2012 17:28, Rebecca Hauck a écrit :
>
>[snipped]
>
>> doing a
>> filtered search for our reference files for our spec on Shepherd.  When
>> I search for my reference files, I get zero results.
>
>http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/search/reference/spec/CSS-Transforms/author
>/rhauck/
>
>returns 27 reference files.
>
>But I found the cause/source of the problem though.
>
>If you select "CSS Transforms" in the "Specification" field select, then
>"CSS3-TRANSFORMS" is added to the query string when it should be
>"CSS-Transforms"
>
>Peter Linss should be notified of this issue.
>
>Gérard
>+CC: Peter Linss
>
>>
>> Should spec links be required (or at least recommended)? If so, does
>> anyone object to me making the update on the wiki?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Rebecca
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
>http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/
>
>CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011:
>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html
>
>CSS 2.1 test suite harness:
>http://test.csswg.org/harness/
>
>Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite:
>http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contr
>ibutions-css21-testsuite.html
>
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 23:46:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 23:47:04 GMT