W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > September 2011

Comments on [RC6] background-position-applies-to-004, vertical-align-117, vertical-align-118

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:12:46 -0700
Message-ID: <484c2b4d1b66b788825f7ce99cf746e5.squirrel@cp3.shieldhost.com>
To: "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>



This testcase is supposed to test background-position applied to a
table-row. Now, if the table-row has only 1 single cell, then how can
such testcase be different from testing background-position being
applied to a table-cell?

My point is that to give a honest, good challenge to browsers, such
testcase should make the table-row have 2 cells at minimum, and ideally
the table should have at least 2 table-rows.

All this is furthermore justified if other testcases demonstrate
failures in some browsers. The testcase I have in mind here is







When the set height of line box is the height of the font, then
'vertical-align: text-bottom' and 'vertical-align: bottom' are by
definition (positioned) the same: the bottom of the line box is given by
the bottommost point of glyphs (like descenders of p, q, y, j glyphs) of
the font. Same thing with text-top and top.

What I am trying to say here is that vertical-align values text-bottom,
text-top, bottom and text-bottom should be tested where/when the
line-height is greater than the font-size. So that top half-leading and
bottom half-leading are not 0. So that such values give different
rendered layout, different vertical values. So that vertical-align
values text-bottom, text-top, bottom and text-bottom show and
demonstrate differences. Otherwise, it is not a well targeted testcase,
even for a basic testing of vertical-align values text-bottom, text-top,
bottom and text-bottom.

I suggest a line-height of 3em: that way, fractional pixel (for top
half-leading and bottom half-leading) are avoided, top is
predictable/predicted to be 1em further toward the top of text-top,
bottom is predictable/predicted to be 1em further toward the bottom of

regards, Gérard
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:

CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011

CSS 2.1 test suite harness:
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2011 22:13:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:23 UTC