W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2011

RE: [CSS21] z-index-020 test case is invalid

From: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:12:36 +0000
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <07349ECFC3608F48BC3B10459913E70B1493673F@TK5EX14MBXC293.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 2:59 PM L. David Baron
> On Wednesday 2011-10-26 21:21 +0000, Arron Eicholz wrote:
> > I think you misread steps in Appendix E. The Webkit and Gecko,
> > renderings are incorrect per the reading and explanation I gave of
> > Appendix E and the optional position to paint outlines of 7.3. The
> > outline (fuchsia) paints in tree order and before the following
> > inline-block (aqua).
> 
> I didn't disagree with that (though I haven't read √ėyvind Stenhaug's response
> yet, which might lead me to).

Ok good. I was more just confirming

> However, I pointed out that Appendix E contradicts other statements in the
> specification.

I think your conclusions is correct I think you might have found an issue in Appendix E. But as you said its unrelated to the issue I raised.

> 
> I'd also point out that the first option in Appendix E is a pretty bad behavior,
> since it allows outlines to be covered by the background of an inline on the
> previous line.  I think what Gecko and WebKit implement is preferable to that
> behavior.
> 

Yeah the option for outlines that is called out in 7.2.2 seems a little odd to me too as you called out in your other email.

--
Thanks,
Arron Eicholz



Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2011 22:16:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 26 October 2011 22:17:00 GMT