- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:44:28 -0800
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Boris, [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/block-in-inline-append-001.htm [RC6] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/block-in-inline-append-001-ref.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/block-in-inline-append-001.htm [nightly-unstable] http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/block-in-inline-append-001-ref.htm Both block-in-inline-append-001 and block-in-inline-append-001-ref have validation issues. The body element must have with a block container. <!ELEMENT BODY O O (%block;|SCRIPT)+ +(INS|DEL) -- document body --> As strange as it is, Opera 11.52 (displays a rectangular dotted line which is 10em wide), Chrome 15.0.874.121 (no dotted outline shown) and Firefox 8.0 (there are vertical "whiskers" on the left hand side of the first "A") have 3 different renderings of the reftest. So, they all "pass" the test ... according to/with 3 different respective reftests that they render. The test and its reftest definitely fail at determining in a reliable manner what is a fail condition. And I think a 4th way of rendering the test and the reftest would be okay too: with a non-rectangular shape which would outline the outermost inline. I have not checked yet with IE8 and IE9. regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite harness: http://test.csswg.org/harness/ Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2011 00:45:08 UTC