W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > February 2011

Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:02:16 -0800
Message-ID: <23a4d16b12f4a073d8a74807b7858242.squirrel@cp3.shieldhost.com>
To: "taka oshiyama" <oshiyama@est.co.jp>
Cc: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>

Le Lun 14 février 2011 0:09, taka oshiyama a écrit :
> Talbot-san
>
> Please find an updated one here!
> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/east-tokyo/submitted/css3-writing-modes/writing-mode-vertical-rl-001.xht
>


> 5-yes, I did. (complete eliminated unnecessary tags)

Taka,

I still do not understand why you use 'white-space: pre' on the <div>
and why the testcase would need or would require 'white-space: pre'. I
believe normal line-wrapping and white-space collapsing should still
occur, should still happen even when writing-mode is vertical and block
flow is right to left.

Except for that 'white-space: pre' issue, the testcase
writing-mode-vertical-rl-001.xht is good.


<suggestion-food for thought>

For other testcases, - just a possibility - you could create a
self-meaningful shape or form out of the expected patterns of blue
squares and and yellow squares. Your initial testcase is like comparing
2 mosaics of size 6 x 6 .

E.g.:

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110111/html4/c5502-imrgn-r-003.htm

For testers, this c5502-imrgn-r-003 is very good: very short (statement
defining expected results is very short/fast to read), very clear and
unambiguous and very easy/very fast to figure out and also reliable.

In terms of shape or form, there are lots of possibilities here.

</suggestion-food for thought>

But again, except for that 'white-space: pre' issue (which I do not
understand: I think it should be avoided), the testcase
writing-mode-vertical-rl-001.xht is good.

regards, Gérard
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 test suite (RC5; January 11th 2011):
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110111/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite contributors:
http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 19:02:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 15 February 2011 19:03:05 GMT