W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2010

Re: Corrections to the Implemention Reports

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:33:24 -0400
Message-ID: <4CC97BA4.7060705@mit.edu>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>, John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
>> On this note, is it indeed acceptable to use current beta or dev
>> builds of Chrome for the IR?
> If the entire source is available along with build instructions
> such that a member of the public can build a binary identical
> to the one you used for testing, then, yes.

Hold on.  I thought we had some criteria along the lines of "sort of 
shippable" (relaxed from "actually shipped") and in particular wanted to 
exclude special test builds, nightlies, etc, no?

I haven't sorted out what the "beta" and "dev" labeling actually means 
in Chrome's case, but based on my weak understanding it seems like "dev" 
would not be acceptable and "beta" might be.

Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 13:33:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:21 UTC