W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2010

Re: Corrections to the Implemention Reports

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:53:57 -0700
Message-ID: <4CC94835.7000600@inkedblade.net>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>, John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On 10/28/2010 01:43 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Peter Linss<peter.linss@hp.com>  wrote:
>> If the currently published IR doesn't match actual results from the public
>> beta then I suggest you publish an updated IR asap (replace the one on
>> w3.org and send a note to www-style and this list when it's updated).
>
> On this note, is it indeed acceptable to use current beta or dev
> builds of Chrome for the IR?  I had heard chatter about it, and
> apparently people are actually doing so, but as far as I know our pass
> criteria still requires public versions and so Chrome's IR (against
> RC1, and so somewhat obsolete now anyway) was done with Chrome 6,
> which was the current public channel release at the time.  Is it
> "public" if you can download the source from chromium.org?

If the entire source is available along with build instructions
such that a member of the public can build a binary identical
to the one you used for testing, then, yes.

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 09:54:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 28 October 2010 09:54:43 GMT