http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/border-width-applies-to-001.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/border-width-applies-to-002.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/border-width-applies-to-003.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/border-width-applies-to-004.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/border-width-applies-to-005.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/border-width-applies-to-006.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/border-width-applies-to-007.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/border-width-applies-to-013.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/border-width-applies-to-014.htm Technically, these are invalid since there is no normative section defining widths in automatic table layout. I think adding table-layout:fixed and width:3in in the #table ruleset will fix it. (I'm guessing there are a lot more such tests.) -- Øyvind Stenhaug Core Norway, Opera Software ASAReceived on Tuesday, 19 October 2010 15:35:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 October 2010 15:35:09 GMT