- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
David Baron wrote: > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/font-family-name-016.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/font-family-name-016-ref.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/font-family-name-016.xht > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/font-family-name-016-ref.xht > Based on the recent clarifications to the rules for parsing > 'font-family', these tests are invalid because the font family > "CSSTest Weights 400" must be quoted since 400 is not an identifier. > > (It looks like all the test was intended to test was that the family > name worked when unquoted, so I think it should be removed, but > perhaps it was intended to test more than that?) Agreed, this test is invalid. As you suggest, it was written prior to the changes that require unquoted family names to be a sequence of idents. John Daggett
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 13:02:01 UTC