W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2010

Re: font-family-name-016 invalid due to numbers in unquoted font-family names

From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Message-ID: <1920788601.98831.1287406884460.JavaMail.root@cm-mail03.mozilla.org>
David Baron wrote:
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/font-family-name-016.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/font-family-name-016-ref.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/font-family-name-016.xht
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/font-family-name-016-ref.xht
> Based on the recent clarifications to the rules for parsing
> 'font-family', these tests are invalid because the font family
> "CSSTest Weights 400" must be quoted since 400 is not an identifier.
> (It looks like all the test was intended to test was that the family
> name worked when unquoted, so I think it should be removed, but
> perhaps it was intended to test more than that?)

Agreed, this test is invalid.  As you suggest, it was written prior to the
changes that require unquoted family names to be a sequence of idents.

John Daggett
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 13:02:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:21 UTC