W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2010

Re: margin-collapse-036 will be invalid when issue-159 is addressed

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 03:06:30 -0700
Message-ID: <838b85bd22baad56e9569fb143fbec53.squirrel@cp3.shieldhost.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, "Bruno Fassino" <fassino@gmail.com>, "Hilbrand Edskes" <hilbrand@edskes.com>
> Once issue-159 is addressed, these tests:
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/margin-collapse-036.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/margin-collapse-036.xht
will become invalid because the internal contradiction in the spec
will have been fixed.  (The contradiction was that in this case:
>   <div id="a" style="min-height: 100px">
>     <div id="b"></div>
>   </div>
> the spec said that the top and bottom margin of "a" were not
> adjoining, but that all the consecutive pairs of margins (top-a
> top-b, top-b bottom-b, bottom-b bottom-a) were adjoining, which
> aren't simultaneously possible.)
> The current proposal for that issue is here:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0684.html

David,

I have removed margin-collapse-036 from my directory:

Revision version 1505

+CC: Bruno Fassino, Hilbrand Edskes

regards, Gérard
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 test suite (RC2; October 1st 2010):
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite contributors:
http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Saturday, 16 October 2010 10:07:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 16 October 2010 10:07:10 GMT