W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2010

Re: content-072.htm is invalid

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:27:16 -0700
To: "Gérard Talbot" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20101015022716.GA31523@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Thursday 2010-10-14 19:24 -0700, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
> 
> > On Thursday 2010-10-14 18:26 -0700, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
> >>
> >> > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/content-072.htm
> >> > relies on an attribute expansion mechanism that would expand
> >> > <script defer> to <script defer="defer"> as far as what the CSS
> >> > attr() function sees.  No such mechanism exists in
> >> > http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/ , so this test is invalid.  I tend to
> >> > think it should be removed.
> >>
> >> The default, implied value for defer attribute is "defer" in HTML
> >> 4.01.
> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/scripts.html#h-18.2.1
> >
> > That's not true in HTML5, and in HTML4 it was only a piece of
> > fiction.
> 
> Then, let's test with checked or selected or readonly.
> 
> > The CSS test suite is not the place to test that HTML handling is
> > based on SGML DTD processing.
> 
> I agree that the CSS 2.1 test suite should not be an HTML4 test suite at
> the same time. But then a browser should also have a decent compliance
> with HTML4 to begin with.
> 
> So what's your opinion on testing on minimized attribute checked or
> selected or readonly?

We should not be testing for the values of minimized attributes in
the CSS test suite.

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Friday, 15 October 2010 02:27:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 15 October 2010 02:27:58 GMT