- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:05:18 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On Wednesday 2010-10-13 20:39 -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 10/13/10 7:32 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > >The tests: > >http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/xhtml1/absolute-replaced-width-016.xht > >http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/xhtml1/absolute-replaced-width-017.xht > >http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/xhtml1/absolute-replaced-width-018.xht > >appear to me to be incorrect. > > > >The svg element in these tests has no intrinsic ratio and no > >intrinsic size, since it has no viewBox and no height/width > >attributes. > > SVG defaults the width/height attributes to 100% if they're not > specified. So the sizing there looks correct (and is interoperable > at least with Webkit and Presto). Right; I had the feeling I was forgetting something. So the Gecko behavior on this test is correct. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 01:05:47 UTC