Řyvind and Geoffrey, http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/c414-flt-ln-002.htm We discussed the c414-flt-ln-002 test before. I would like to know if http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/c414-flt-ln-002-draft.htm is ok with you. If not, what would you change. The meta assert is new to the testcase; interact flag has been added. I think the testcase is important to keep (otherwise to restaure, improve) and I think it's important to keep the notice/invitation to decrease|increase text size and viewport width; without such notice/invitation, then the testcase is not as worthy, valuable as it would/could be for the test suite. Řyvind, you wrote in http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/issues#tests-that-need-usability-improvements that the testcase is too complex. What about http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/c414-flt-ln-002-draft.htm then? regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (RC2; October 1st 2010): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2010 20:15:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 October 2010 20:16:10 GMT