W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Zero passing or One passing browser tests

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 03:51:50 +0100
Message-ID: <1251350295.20101119035150@w3.org>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
CC: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, w3c-css-wg <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>
On Thursday, November 18, 2010, 11:55:30 PM, L. wrote:

LDB> On Thursday 2010-11-18 23:43 +0100, Chris Lilley wrote:
>> On Thursday, November 18, 2010, 11:20:49 PM, Arron wrote:

>>  
>> AE> http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/results
>>  
>> AE> I have completed the Zero browser passing and One browser passing page for the RC3 test suite.

>> I think some of the background-intrinsic* tests can be either changed or removed, given recent discussions and clarifications on the svg width and height attributes and how these are not the CSS width and height properties, as explained here
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/coords.html#IntrinsicSizing

LDB> I thought that discussion proved the tests to be correct; I was
LDB> previously alleging that they were invalid based on the
LDB> misunderstanding.

I will need to look at them closely then. I thought they were failing because of the misinterpretation.





-- 
 Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain                 
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
 Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Monday, 22 November 2010 16:20:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 November 2010 16:20:27 GMT