- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 20:43:54 -0700
- To: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
- Cc: "Arron Eicholz" <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
Hello all, Arron wrote: > If there are cases that have this fractional pixel problem let me know. http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_8/padding-bottom-036.htm #div1's padding-bottom is computed as 37.8px = 1cm while #div2's margin-top is computed as -75.6px = 2cm 96px/in / 2.54cm/in = 37.795px; 2cms = 75.59px but as I earlier said, some browsers (Firefox 3.6.3, Konqueror 4.4.3, Safari 4.0.5) will truncate the fraction part. #div1's height is 75px (not 76px) and positioned at 51px from top of document box while #div2's height is 37px, has a border-bottom of 37 (so 74px, not 75px) and positioned at 50px from top of document box. #div2's margin-top is -75.6px but the .6px is truncated. Everything is nicely reported in Firefox's DOM inspector. Same thing with Konqueror's DOM treeviewer. So, that's why there is a tiny red border seen, noticeable in that testcase in Firefox 3.6.3, Konqueror 4.4.3 and Safari 4.0.5. --------------- http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_8/padding-bottom-014.htm also displays, shows a tiny red border in Firefox 3.6.3 and Konqueror 4.4.3. Those 2 testcases should be reviewed, adjusted so that the fractional pixel issue be avoided. regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (alpha 2; March 16th 2010): http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/20100316/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Monday, 17 May 2010 03:44:31 UTC