W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > May 2010

Re: review of bzbarsky's self-describing tests

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 18:05:35 -0700
Message-ID: <4BF0965F.8070208@inkedblade.net>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On 05/14/2010 02:55 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 5/14/10 5:34 PM, fantasai wrote:
>> I can't tell what dynamic-top-changes-004.xht is trying to test.
>> It's very similar to dynamic-top-changes-002.xht, but not quite,
>> and the assertion is completely wrong.
> Aha. Yes, fixed. 003 had a problem here similar to 002, actually, I
> fixed that too. I also updated the asserts on 002, 003, 004 to better
> match reality.
>> I'm also having trouble figuring out what the intention of
>> dynamic-top-changes-005.xht is in its differences from
>> dynamic-top-changes-001.xht.
> Ah. As I recall the key is whether the grandparent is abs pos or rel
> pos. I've updated the assertions for the two tests to make that clearer.
> The rest of the differences are just dealing wit the fact that
> #grandparent is now abspos, various other styles are needed on the body
> and on the body > p to make things actually line up correctly and for
> the text to show up. And since the font-size is 0, the test has to use
> pixel top instead of em.
> Take another look and let me know whether things are clearer now?

Yes, thanks. :) I tweaked the titles a bit and shifted them into approved/.


Received on Monday, 17 May 2010 01:06:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:19 UTC