W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > December 2010

Re: bidi-alt-001 probably invalid

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:31:20 -0800
Message-ID: <4D012E88.4060700@inkedblade.net>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On 10/05/2010 04:36 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> I don't think the text in
> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#propdef-unicode-bidi is
> precise enough to imply that unicode-bidi, applied to an img, must
> affect that img's alternate text.  This is particularly true since
> images are replaced elements, and Chapter 3 describes replaced
> elements as outside the scope of the CSS formatting model.

I've modified the test to set "width: 0" on the images,
which should cause any engine that treats alt text as
replaced content to make the image content invisible.
http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/src/bidi-text/bidi-alt-001.xht

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 19:32:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 9 December 2010 19:34:34 GMT