W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > December 2010

Re: [RC2] 13 Testcases with a missing (9 ahem, 4 dom) flag

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:27:34 -0800
Message-ID: <4D012DA6.9090704@inkedblade.net>
To: css21testsuite@gtalbot.org, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On 10/03/2010 02:49 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Testcases with ahem flag missing
> --------------------------------
>
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/units-001.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/units-002.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/units-003.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/units-004.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/units-006.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/units-008.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/units-009.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/floats-006.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/floats-009.htm

I believe these have been fixed for RC4.

> Testcases with dom flag missing
> -------------------------------
>
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/text-transform-bicameral-006.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/text-transform-bicameral-007.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/text-transform-bicameral-008.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/text-transform-bicameral-009.htm

None of these tests actually require DOM support -- it's just there
to help out in case the system font lookup isn't capable of finding
the right fonts to display the test.

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 19:32:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 9 December 2010 19:33:28 GMT