W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > November 2007

RE: new page-break-inside assertion

From: Grant, Melinda <melinda.grant@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:43:37 +0000
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Michael Turnwall <mturnwall@revenution.com>
CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3BDE2D1FDB4E39468BE86DCA2596365E3C26E1DE@G3W0634.americas.hpqcorp.net>

I've added assertions for the 'avoid' value for page-break-before, -after, and -inside to the page breaks section.  It's a bit redundant with the 'allowed page breaks' section, but they can point to the same test(s) if appropriate.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-css-testsuite-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-css-testsuite-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of fantasai
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 1:40 PM
> To: Michael Turnwall
> Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
> Subject: Re: new page-break-inside assertion
> Michael Turnwall wrote:
> > I think a an assertion needs to be added to the Page-Breaks section.
> >
> > The 'avoid' value of the 'page-break-inside' property does
> not allow a
> > page break inside the box.
> It does, actually, allow a page break inside the box if the
> box is too big to fit on the page. This is covered by a set
> of rules later in the spec. You could assert that it doesn't
> allow a page break inside the box if breaks are allowed
> before and after the box and the box is small enough to fit
> on the page. :) Feel free to edit the wiki as appropriate; I
> get notified about changes, so I'll get a chance to review them then.
> ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 21:47:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:17 UTC