Re: DID Use Case: Public Pointers to Private Data

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:31 PM Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>
wrote:

> I don't understand Christopher's "consent proof" point in this context.
>

The idea is that some personal correlatable information may not be
readable/decryptable unless the subject has given permission to the reader
AND the reader has returned a signed consent receipt acknowledging that the
have received the info and under what contract/conditions they will
use/hold the personal information.

It is possible to set this all up cryptographically rather than
computational scripts.

— Christopher Allen

>