W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > December 2018

Re: [RESENDING] Review of the current draft DID specification

From: Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@evernym.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 12:45:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFBYrUpqSgPpt2czVignBJzSSh6Ee-EFbAGMqiq1T2VcWxtcHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Michael Herman (Parallelspace)" <mwherman@parallelspace.net>
Cc: "public-credentials@w3.org" <public-credentials@w3.org>
>
> What's the best way to proceed? I'm not sure... ...keep creating new
> issues? ...write a lengthy position paper? ... create a new PR?
>
IMO, it depends on the depth of the issues. If we're talking about verbiage
problems, issues make sense. If we're talking about fundamental conceptual
problems that run through the whole spec, then maybe a paper linked to a
tracking issue might be better.
Received on Monday, 24 December 2018 19:45:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 24 December 2018 19:46:00 UTC