Re: Energy & BlockChain

that would make alot of sense for those involved with the work led by
Drummond, but i'm not sure its necessarily aligned with every possible use
of Verifiable Claims?

The suggestion that they're work items vs. mandatory elements for VCs to
work (meaning verifiable claims) are kinda distinct imho.

TBH.  i was a bit taken-back by the broad nature of perceived changes. I
remember with some pride watching some of the first 'respect network' stuff
many years ago thinking the stuff i was working on was so much better...

now it's just been taken over.


On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 01:43 Susan Bradford <susan.bradford@evernym.com>
wrote:

> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the last discussion between Manu
> and Drummond concluded to just use the Credentials CG mailing list for
> the DID Spec and put the specs as CG work items.
>
>
>
> Susan Bradford
> +1-801-376-5464 <+1%20801-376-5464>
> https://www.evernym.com/
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Timothy Holborn <
> timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 00:43 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/19/2017 07:28 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>> > There is also a block chain CG which may like to discuss energy usage
>>> > of the block chain and consensus mechanisms.
>>>
>>> The W3C Blockchain CG has shut down and is inactive, AFAIK.
>>>
>>
>> Did you consider starting a DID CG?
>>
>> I think they're likely sufficiently different to WebIDs, and i think
>> they're sufficiently different from Verifiable Claims that in-turn require
>> identifiers (URIs ideally?).
>>
>> noting also:
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2017Jul/0005.html
>>
>>
>>> -- manu
>>>
>>> --
>>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
>>> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>>> blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built
>>> http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/
>>>
>>>
>