W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > November 2017

Re: [AGENDA] W3C Credentials CG Call Tue, November 14th 12 ET

From: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 10:46:48 -0600
To: Mark Miller <erights@gmail.com>
Cc: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@blockstream.com>, "W3C Credentials CG \(Public List\)" <public-credentials@w3.org>, "W3C Digital Verification CG \(Public List\)" <public-digital-verification@w3.org>, Joe Andrieu <joe@joeandrieu.com>, Kim Hamilton Duffy <kim@learningmachine.com>
Message-ID: <87a7zo95af.fsf@dustycloud.org>
See the "next meeting" section on the left of: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/

If you can do VoIP over SIP that is preferred, otherwise you can dial in
to the phone number.

The call is in less than 15 minutes... hope to see you there! :)

Mark Miller writes:

> I might be able to attend tomorrow, at least briefly. If I can, how and
> when should I connect?
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Christopher Allan Webber <
> cwebber@dustycloud.org> wrote:
>
>> Christopher Allen writes:
>>
>> > PROPOSED AGENDA:
>> > 1. Agenda Review (2 minutes)
>> > 2. Introductions & Re-Introduction (3 minutes)
>> > 3. Status of Current Action Items (5 minutes)
>> > 4. Review and discussion of status of DID spec 0.7, post
>> > #RebootingWebOfTrust, #IIW & #TPAC, with goal to advance the
>> specification
>> > to 0.8 by end of year. (50 minutes)
>> > https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-spec/
>> >
>> > — W3C-CCG Co-Chairs: Christopher Allen, Joe Andrieu & Kim Hamilton
>>
>> It does not have to be on this immediate call, but at the end of the
>> VCWG face-to-face at TPAC, there was general support expressed for the
>> CCG to take up the "proclamation chains" or "linked data capabilities"
>> work that came out of the last RWoT:
>>
>>   https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rebooting-the-
>> web-of-trust-fall2017/blob/master/draft-documents/lds-ocap/lds-ocap.md
>>
>> It would be good sometime soon to put that on the agenda to discuss.
>>
>> I know Mark Miller is not able to make it to tomorrow's meeting though,
>> and maybe he would want to be there for it.  I am guessing we would have
>> to do it next month in that case?
>>
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2017 16:47:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:42 UTC