W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > March 2016

Re: An educational use case from the POV of the issuer...

From: Eric Korb <eric.korb@accreditrust.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:56:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMX+RnD+XTh3aUXbfFqDHLxEv+RAuMk6igdM7+zhjkPwHDFvhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Tibbetts <john.tibbetts@kinexis.com>
Cc: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
+1 JT We should focus on the "what" not the "how".

Eric

<https://mail.google.com/>

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:10 AM, John Tibbetts <john.tibbetts@kinexis.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for the suggestion Tim,
>
> However I don’t think that’s what a ‘use case’ is.  A use case is a bare
> bones user experience.  In the style of use case that our current use case
> document follows (and also that we follow at Vitalsource) a bogus user is
> specifically named—and if Shane’s writing the use case with a clever name.
>
> I think what you’re talking about is a design sketch and that is what
> we’re specifically enjoined *not* to do in this document.
>
> (And even if we were I still don’t know enough about the
> behind-the-curtain machinery that we’re heading for).
>
> Cheers,
>
> John
>
>
> On Mar 11, 2016, at 6:03 AM, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> if at all possible,
>
> I'd like to see it broken down into a group of creds that represent both a
> package of verifiable claims, in addition to a subset or indeed an element
> of a broader claim capable by the entity seeking to make a claim in a
> privacy preserving manner that still supports validation of the necessary
> particulars (and identification of those who want more, beyond reasonable
> purposes)..
>
> Tim.
>
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 at 00:41 Eric Korb <eric.korb@accreditrust.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> On Mar 10, 2016 9:03 PM, "John Tibbetts" <john.tibbetts@kinexis.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I’ve slightly reworked a use case I turned in earlier that is a tad more
>>> in line with Shane’s Use Case style.  Feel free to use it if you find it
>>> helpful or modify it to suit your needs.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Joleen is the registrar of Mega University and, by virtue of her
>>> office, is responsible for the integrity, accuracy, and security of
>>> academic records.  Joleen has been a pioneering registrar in advocating an
>>> 'extended transcript' that includes not only the standard set of course
>>> grades but also adds supplementary information on learner competencies.
>>> These might include work experiences and non-educational but marketable
>>> skills. Upon the request of her students Joleen issues digital credentials
>>> that encapsulates an extended transcript.*
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>
Received on Friday, 11 March 2016 15:57:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 11 March 2016 15:57:11 UTC