W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > March 2016

Re: Slack group?

From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:18:49 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM1Sok2ERoq8vebtbhjJWVPaa2xFSyv=U0P8FEp6N1RNic9zrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
W3c process has an IPR statement.

Does it breach that?

On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 at 3:17 AM, Christopher Allan Webber <
cwebber@dustycloud.org> wrote:

> Timothy Holborn writes:
>
> > Hi Manu,
> >
> > Given the short timeframes, et.al. I'm pondering whether we should get a
> > slack group up and running...
> >
> >
> > Slack is a bit more user friendly than the traditional irc approach. If
> > it's helpful. Happy to manage it via the webcivics slack instance running
> > already, yet equally happy to participate and/or help with a new
> instance.
> >
> > I have diagrams n such I've been developing. Perhaps a GitHub repo might
> be
> > the final destination or indeed a more effectively organised Google drive
> > for Work in progress.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Tim.
>
> Please don't use Slack... I won't use it.  Their terms of service are
> fairly scary, as I've had it explained to me from someone who did
> in-depth research, and it's a non-standard, centralized approach to
> communication which requires proprietary software.
>
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:19:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:19:30 UTC