Re: Slack group? from Christopher Allan Webber on 2016-03-03 (public-credentials@w3.org from March 2016)

From: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 08:17:17 -0800
To: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Message-ID: <87r3frzgc2.fsf@dustycloud.org>

Timothy Holborn writes:

> Hi Manu,
>
> Given the short timeframes, et.al. I'm pondering whether we should get a
> slack group up and running...
>
>
> Slack is a bit more user friendly than the traditional irc approach. If
> it's helpful. Happy to manage it via the webcivics slack instance running
> already, yet equally happy to participate and/or help with a new instance.
>
> I have diagrams n such I've been developing. Perhaps a GitHub repo might be
> the final destination or indeed a more effectively organised Google drive
> for Work in progress.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Tim.

Please don't use Slack... I won't use it.  Their terms of service are
fairly scary, as I've had it explained to me from someone who did
in-depth research, and it's a non-standard, centralized approach to
communication which requires proprietary software.

Received on Thursday, 3 March 2016 16:17:46 UTC