W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > June 2016

Re: Verifiable Claims WG Proposal (presentation)

From: Eric Korb <eric.korb@truecred.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 21:51:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMX+RnDizB2TfRG2D4yYr=Ko3b_xuYe6RAZKNe4SxzHH-oHTng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
+1 Presentation looks great.

Eric
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TrueCred™ | Digital Credential Trust™
------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Eric R. Korb | Chief Executive Officer | Warren, New Jersey*

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
wrote:

> On 06/20/2016 09:07 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> > What my eyes are seeing looks integrated, straightforward and clear.
> >  It's missing an enormous amount of detail that is important, of
> > course, but it seems to have been selective appropriately, if I
> > understand the goal of the slides (and I think I do, but that's
> > where my newness could be a detriment.)
>
> We have aggressively cut away things that we believe are not necessary
> to when making a high-level decision to start work or not. Hopefully we
> have cut away the right things.
>
> > I think I understand why the simplest form of the architecture
> > diagram is appropriate for this set of slides.
>
> Yes, we believe that most AC Reps want to see a general architecture
> diagram, but don't want to be bothered with the details (as it's the job
> of the Working Group to make sure to get that right).
>
> > The only point I'm a bit curious about is the reason for excluding
> > the more-detailed version of the architecture from one of the
> > referenced 'detail' documents?
>
> The theory goes that the details of having a repository and a verifier
> in the diagram wouldn't cause the W3C AC Rep to change their mind about
> the validity of the architecture and the resulting work at W3C.
>
> The details are important for building the system, but they are
> marginally useful for someone that is trying to decide if they should
> vote to start the work at W3C or not.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> JSON-LD Best Practice: Context Caching
> https://manu.sporny.org/2016/json-ld-context-caching/
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 01:52:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:29 UTC