W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > June 2016

Re: Verifiable Claims WG Proposal (presentation)

From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:03:43 -0600
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3cb56239-75d8-99fe-7c7e-961c9a1e43ba@dcrocker.net>
On 6/21/2016 7:10 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
> On 06/20/2016 09:07 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>> I think I understand why the simplest form of the architecture
>> diagram is appropriate for this set of slides.
> Yes, we believe that most AC Reps want to see a general architecture
> diagram, but don't want to be bothered with the details (as it's the job
> of the Working Group to make sure to get that right).


>> The only point I'm a bit curious about is the reason for excluding
>> the more-detailed version of the architecture from one of the
>> referenced 'detail' documents?
> The details are important for building the system, but they are
> marginally useful for someone that is trying to decide if they should
> vote to start the work at W3C or not.

That last paragraph is a nice gem that should be engraved in any 
tutorial materials for folk trying to get a standards effort started...



   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 20:04:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:30 UTC