W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > February 2016

Re: Verifiable Claims Telecon Minutes for 2016-02-09

From: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 14:59:32 -0800
To: public-credentials@w3.org
Message-ID: <56C106D4.4020504@sunshine.net>
On 2/14/16 1:44 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
> I'm happy with 'evaluators', but wonder what our colleagues in the
> education industry think? ...[snip]
> Credential/Claim Requestor and Credential/Claim Verifier could also work?

IMO any of Requestor, Verifier, or Evaluator would be preferable to 

Except, Requestor could be confused with 'holder', the person/entity 
asking for the original issuing, since at the start they are 
'requesting' that a credential be issued for them -- which they then 
take elsewhere to be Evaluated or Verified (or, currently, Consumed).

But as you noted, with multiple possible systems in play -- finance, 
education, payments, government -- it's going to be hard not to cause 
at least some confusion somewhere.

Received on Sunday, 14 February 2016 23:00:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:27 UTC