W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-coremob@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Feb 2013 edition of "Standards for Web Applications on Mobile: current state and roadmap"

From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:53:20 +0100
Message-ID: <5135C090.4090207@lamouri.fr>
To: public-coremob@w3.org
On 05/03/13 10:44, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> Le mardi 05 mars 2013 à 09:59 +0100, Mounir Lamouri a écrit :
>> FWIW, there is a small mistake: Firefox Mobile supports <input
>> type='{date,time}'> but not all of them yet (I guess it could be marked
>> as partial).
> Good catch! I've corrected this, and also sent a related patch to
> caniuse.com, one of the sources I use to keep the data uptodate:
> https://github.com/Fyrd/caniuse/pull/139

Thanks :)

> (as an aside, MDN doesn't know about it either
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/HTML/Element/Input )

Indeed, our documentation team has to update that but I believe this is
on their todo list.

>> Also, maybe it could be worth having a Firefox OS entry for the next
>> issue of this report?
> Yeah, I've been wondering how to report implementations from Web-based
> OS (and in particular based on work in SysApps), but haven't quite
> figured it out. It might be that a separate report would make sense (or
> just a separate section in this report?)

I think Firefox OS should be added as another implementations (like
Firefox Mobile, Android browser or Chrome Mobile). I would see
specifications from SysApps as other items in the report. If we want to
push the Web as a Platform, I do not believe it would be a good idea to
do a strong distinction between SysApps and the rest. Maybe adding a
simple disclaimer before the SysApps section saying that those specs are
meant to be implemented outside of the browser scope would be fair though.

Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2013 09:53:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:05:48 UTC